THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
07/27/07 -- Vol. 26, No. 4, Whole Number 1451

 El Presidente: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
 The Power Behind El Pres: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion 
unless otherwise noted.

 To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
 To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Topics:
        The Top Ten Weird and Bizarre Japanese Soft Drinks
                (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
        Crosswords (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
        Remembering Numbers (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
        This Week's Reading (Science Fiction Museum and Hall of
                Fame) (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

===================================================================


TOPIC: The Top Ten Weird and Bizarre Japanese Soft Drinks 
(comments by Mark R. Leeper)

For all Worldcon-goers: 

http://inventorspot.com/ten_bizarre_japanese_soft_drinks

Not even a mention of Pocari Sweat!  [-mrl]

===================================================================


TOPIC: Crosswords (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

I was looking at our newspaper recycle stack and there was a stack 
of single sheets, which had crossword puzzles that Evelyn had 
worked.  I suggested she should pass them to me to work when she 
was done with them.  "What would be the point?  They have already 
been done," she asked.  "Ah, but you did them in pencil.  That is 
the easy way.  I would do them in pen!" [-mrl]

===================================================================


TOPIC: Remembering Numbers (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

One of the topics I like to share here is my little devices that 
I have invented to make my life easier.  I have written about my 
technique to diagram the characters and action of a story.  I 
also described what I call a technique of "cheat" reading of 
books.  This is a way I have of essentially creating for myself a 
condensation of a book that can be read more quickly but to not 
miss most of the essential action.  I have been meaning to 
explain the technique I use to remember numbers.  I did not 
invent this one, but I find it useful and have taught it to a few 
other people.

It is based on the assumption that words are easier to remember 
than numbers.  When you need to remember a number, it is easier 
to remember words than digits.  Each of the ten digits correspond 
to a unique set of phonetic consonant sounds, each of which sounds 
much like the others that get mapped to the same digit.

Suppose you wish to remember the phone number 732-681-7141.  That 
is a difficult phone number to retain.  Instead I remember the 
phrase "Come now.  Jeff dog-tired."  That phrase is much easier 
to remember than the phone number.  Yet I can memorize the phrase 
and quickly turn it back into the phone number.

So what is the mapping of phonetics to digits?  

1 is mapped to "t", to "d" and to "th".
To remember this just think that "t" and "d" have a vertical 
stroke like a "1" does.


2 is mapped to "n".
To remember this just think that "n" has a straight bar and an 
arch like "2" does.


3 is mapped to "m".
To remember this just think that "m" has two arches like "3" 
does.

4 is mapped to "r".
To remember this just think that the fourth letter of the word 
"four" is an "r".


5 is mapped to "l".
To remember this just think that "l" if you open your hand wide 
so that your thumb and pinky and your hand form an "l" you will 
see all five fingers.


6 is mapped to "sh", to "j" and to "zh".  Also a soft "g".
To remember this just think that six sounds like sex which you 
hush up.  (OK, sorry about that, but that is how I remember it.)


7 is mapped to "k", to hard "g" and to hard "c".
To remember this just think that "k" is a vertical stroke and two 
strokes that look like a "7".


8 is mapped to "f" and "v".
To remember this just think that a script "f" looks like an "8".


9 is mapped to "p", and to "b".
To remember this just think that a "p" or "b" looks like an "9" 
flipped around.


0 is mapped to "s", to "z" and to soft "c".
To remember this just think that a "z" is the first letter of 
"zero".


There is no mapping for "h" and "w" so those can be used as 
needed.

The phone number above starts with 732.  That can be "cumin" or 
"come on" or "come now" or "cue ham now" or "game now."  It takes 
some imagination to find words that seem better than gibberish.  
The entire number 732-681-7141 comes from the phrase "Come now.  
Jeff dog-tired." or "Come (73) now (2).  Jeff (68) dog (17)-tired 
(141)."

One time on a "Dress-Down Day" I wore a T-shirt that had printed 
on it pi to some large number of places.  A friend saw it and 
without looking recited the value of pi to 40 decimal places.  In 
high school he had spent two afternoons and memorized pi to 40 
decimal places.  I told him I was impressed.  I then retired to 
my office.  Ten minutes later I walked into his office and 
without looking recited the value of pi to 60 decimal places.

Of course, I have now forgotten those phrases but can come up with 
some new ones.  He probably still remembers his 40.  But I can 
repeat my feat with a little effort. 

Consider these nonsense phrases:

Motor to Alpine Jail, male VP.
Keep my name fresh, Nature Mama.
Foe man, keep losin' favor to big-dish bomb.

(Note that the "t" in "Nature" is pronounced like a "ch" so it 
becomes a 6.)

Perhaps the greatest effort is trying to turn the sentences into 
more than just random words. Those are nonsense phrases, but 
perhaps not a lot harder to memorize than three lines of 
Shakespeare.  If I go to the numerical equivalent I have

3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939

That is 45 decimal places of pi.  The problem with mnemonic 
devices is that you have to remember the mnemonic.  [-mrl]

===================================================================


TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

[This continues the description of the Science Fiction Museum 
and Hall of Fame in Seattle.]

As I noted earlier, there is now one admission for both the 
Science Fiction Museum and EMP (the Experience Music Project).  
So we went through EMP, but fairly quickly, because there was 
little of interest.  One room was devoted to the history of the 
guitar, mildly interesting from a technical standpoint, but not 
enthralling.  The Jimi Hendrix room was even less interesting, 
and the hands-on stuff had no appeal for us.  The "Northwest 
Passage", a corridor about local groups, broadcasting, and so 
on--was completely foreign to me.  What we did see of all these 
took a total about about forty-five minutes.

There was one display, a temporary one, that was of interest to 
us--"Disney: The Music Behind the Magic".  This had a video 
about the history of music in Disney films.  We missed the first 
few minutes, which covered "Steamboat Willie" (in which Mickey 
Mouse was making music), "Snow White", "Dumbo", and "Fantasia".  
We came in at "Pinocchio", which was described as a prototype of 
the action-adventure film, and one of the first to have themes 
(leitmotifs) for each character.  After this came "Bambi", more 
pastoral, more of a tone poem, and with definite influences from 
Igor Stravinsky.

They then skipped ahead to "The Little Mermaid", mostly because 
I think they were covering animated films first, then live 
action.  The claim was that "The Little Mermaid" had been the 
first fully integrated musical (one in which the songs move the 
story) since the 1960s.  That is not just the first Disney 
musical, but the first anybody had made.

They talked about how many of the films not have an "I want" 
moment: in "Cinderella" it is "Someday My Prince Will Come"; in 
"The Little Mermaid" it is "Part of That World".  Some reviewer 
had said of "Beauty and the Beast" that "the best Broadway 
musical" was now on screen rather than stage.

Apparently the technique used is to write the songs before the 
story is complete, so that they can be incorporated properly.  
"The Lion King" was the most successful musical, with more pop 
music, and song-over-action ("The Circle of Life") as well as 
songs to propel plot ("I Just Can't Wait to Be King").

It was commented that "Whole New World" and "Beauty and the 
Beast" are sung everywhere: high school graduations, etc.

Leonard Maltin described "Mary Poppins" has having "exposition 
set to music."  There was no mention of Disney's most recent 
live-action musical, "Newsies", nor of the song "A Whale of a 
Tale" from "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea".

Everyone kept talking about "Walt Disney's music," but of 
course, it's not his music, but that of various composers.  
(Someone in the video did actually note this.)

One comment--the videos in the EMP section were shown on a big 
screen, while it was tiny screens for most of the science 
fiction (the "Cities" one was on a fifteen-foot wide screen that 
was maybe four feet high).

This was a fairly long video (probably about a half hour).  The 
display "Disney: The Music Behind the Magic" began with 
"Steamboat Willie" (1928).  There was a chance to hear eight 
different versions of "When You Wish upon a Star", most of which 
were unappealing.

The film "Bambi" had less than 950 words of dialogue.

The "Mickey Mouse Club" had versions in the 1950s, 1970s, and 
1990s.  The latter had Justin Timberlake, Christina Aguilar, and 
Britney Spears.

All this took another hour or so.  We were about to leave the 
EMP and return to the Science Fiction Museum for another hour or 
so when we noticed that "Sound & Vision: Artists Tell Their 
Stories" included science fiction authors.  They probably put 
the science fiction ones there because they had the technology, 
but there is no indication in the Science Fiction Museum of it, 
and before the single-admission policy, people who went to only 
the Science Fiction Museum could not see this.

We watched clips of Ray Harryhausen talking about animating 
skeletons, and Frederik Pohl on the first Worldcon.  A clip on 
writing included Greg Bear, Ray Bradbury, Harlan Ellison, Harry 
Harrison, and Connie Willis.

"What Is Science Fiction?" had answers from George Lucas, and 
Connie Willis, who quoted Judith Merril as saying that science 
fiction was a giant thought experiment in which you change one 
premise and see the results.  Willis also cited Ben Bova and a 
panel of NASA scientists who decided that it was when science 
was at the center, science drove the plot, and it was real 
science.  Willis said that it ruled out a lot of what people 
consider science fiction, and Bova said, "Yes, but none of 
mine."  James Cameron noted that science fiction is not 
predictive (no writers predicted the PC revolution).).  [Murray 
Leinster's "A Logic Named Joe (1946)", which can be found at 
http://tinyurl.com/28q5yx, comes fairly close.  -mrl]  It also 
had Steven Spielberg, David Gerrold, Harlan Ellison, and Samuel 
R. Delany.

Another clip on conventions had Greg Bear and several other 
people.  David Gerrold talked about his first panel, where he 
was seated between Isaac Asimov and Hal Clement, and quite 
intimidated about his position as a "newbie".  Harry Harrison 
told about a young man who came up to him during the Vietnam era 
and said he had enlisted, then went home and happened to read 
"Bill, the Galactic Hero", and immediately tore up his 
enlistment papers.  (Apparently, there was a waiting period at 
that time.)  Astrid Anderson Bear talked about her first 
costume, as a baby vampire bat ("if a baby cat is a kitten, then 
a baby bat is a bittne").

The filmmaking clip had Dennis Muren ("E.T."), Ray Harryhausen 
(stop-motion in "Mighty Joe Young"), James Cameron ("Alien" 
queen), Harlan Ellison (his usual rant about Hollywood), and 
David Gerrold ("Star Trek")

We finished up with another half-hour or so in the Science 
Fiction Museum, until closing time.

And now for general and summary comments.

The rooms in the Science Fiction Museum are way under-lit--bring 
a flashlight if you want to be able to take notes, or even see 
some of the labels a little better.  (The cases are reasonably 
well lit, but the rooms themselves are really dark.)

Someone said she did not like the Museum because it was not 
someplace you could go many times.  She had asked them if they 
would be rotating the magazine covers, but after seeing the 
exhibits, I think this would not be very easy, because the 
exhibits are all themed.  (You could swap in new ones for BEMs 
and Babes", I suppose.)  The art exhibit does rotate, I think.

Both of these museums were created/funded by Paul Allen, and a 
lot of the items in the cases in the Science Fiction Museum are 
from his private collection.  This is why there is this strange 
combination of two museums in one building.  It is true that the 
price is now higher than the price before, but 1) most people 
will probably get *something* more than we did out of the EMP, and 
2) people can now use the "Sound & Vision" for the science fiction 
clips (assuming, of course, that they know about them).

Is the museum worth it?  For a science fiction fan visiting 
Seattle, definitely.  But it is not a "destination museum" in 
the way as the Metropolitan Museum of Art, or El Prado, or even 
the Cosmosphere (Hutchinson, Kansas).  And one can argue that a 
lot of what ones sees is similar to the displays at science 
fiction conventions, though obviously on a much larger scale.

The website for the Museum is at http://www.sfhomeworld.org.

In keeping with the theme, and to promote the "Star Wars" stamps 
that will be released May 25, a mailbox near the Museum had been 
painted to look like R2D2.  See 
http://www.uspsjedimaster.com for more details.

This concludes the description of the Science Fiction Museum and 
Hall of Fame in Seattle.  Finally.]  [-ecl]

===================================================================

                                          Mark Leeper
 mleeper@optonline.net


           First love is only a little foolishness 
           and a lot of curiosity.
                    -- George Bernard Shaw John Bull's Other Island

-- 
Evelyn C. Leeper
The greatest use of life is to spend it for something 
that will outlast it.  --William James